English
English
Español
Português
русский
français
日本語
Deutsch
Tiếng Việt
Italiano
Nederlands
ไทย
Polski
한국어
Svenska
magyar
Malay
বাংলা
Dansk
Suomi
हिन्दी
Pilipino
Türk
Gaeilge
عربى
Indonesia
norsk
اردو
čeština
Ελληνικά
Українська
Javanese
فارسی
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
नेपाली
Burmese
български
ລາວ
Latine
Қазақ
Euskal
Azərbaycan
slovenský
Македонски
Lietuvos
Eesti Keel
Română
Slovenski
मराठी
Српски
Esperanto
Afrikaans
Català
עִברִית
Cymraeg
Galego
Latvietis
icelandic
יידיש
Беларус
Hrvatski
Kreyòl ayisyen
Shqiptar
Malti
lugha ya Kiswahili
አማርኛ
Bosanski
Frysk
ជនជាតិខ្មែរ
ქართული
ગુજરાતી
Hausa
Кыргыз тили
ಕನ್ನಡ
Corsa
Kurdî
മലയാളം
Maori
Монгол хэл
Hmong
IsiXhosa
Zulu
Punjabi
پښتو
Chichewa
Samoa
Sesotho
සිංහල
Gàidhlig
Cebuano
Somali
Точик
O'zbek
Hawaiian
سنڌي
Shinra
հայերեն
Igbo
Sundanese
Lëtzebuergesch
Malagasy
Yoruba
Javanese
Banbala
Pokjoper
Divih
Philippine
Gwadani
Elokano
Pipes freeze and crack frequently in winter, and many people's first reaction is to install an electric heat tracing system. But did you know? There are many alternatives on the market, and some even cost less! Today, from the engineer's point of view, we reveal 3 kinds of ‘cold’ anti-freezing methods, and analyse why most people still choose the electric heat tracing in the end.
Option 1: insulation cotton parcel method (low-cost but inefficient)
Principle: through the rock wool, rubber and other materials wrapped pipes, reduce heat loss.
Advantages: low initial cost (about 10-30 yuan / metre), construction is simple.
Fatal flaws:
extreme low temperature (<-10 ℃), the insulation layer will condense and absorb water, but to accelerate heat dissipation;
need to be replaced regularly, wet environment prone to mould.
Applicable scenario: short-term frost protection, temperature higher than -5 ℃ in the southern region.
Option 2: Steam Tracing (traditional solution for industrial scenarios)
Principle: lay steam pipes next to the pipeline and continuously heat it with hot steam.
Advantages: Suitable for large chemical plants, oil refineries and other high temperature demand scenarios.
Fatal flaws:
Very high energy consumption (annual steam cost of 1km of piping exceeds 500.000 RMB);
Risk of scalding and leakage.
Applicable scenarios: heavy industrial plants that have steam boilers, and are not sensitive to cost.
Programme three: electric heating belt (electric accompanied by the heat of the ‘low version’) principle: winding resistance wire plus tropical tape, heat insulation after power. Advantage: installation flexibility, unit price is low (about 15-20 yuan / metre). Fatal defects: temperature is not controllable, easy to overheat and damage the pipeline (see Figure 3: electric heating with burnt insulation); power consumption is self-control temperature electric accompanying heat 2-3 times. Applicable scene: short distance, intermittent use of non-important pipeline.
Why is electric trace heating still the ultimate solution?
Despite the existence of alternatives, the electric heat tracing system has become the mainstream with 3 advantages:
Intelligent temperature control: automatic adjustment of power through temperature sensors, energy saving of more than 30%;
Safe and maintenance-free: PTC material eliminates the risk of overheating, the service life of more than 10 years;
Full scene coverage: -50 ° C extreme cold, flammable and explosive places can be customised.
When choosing pipeline anti-freezing solutions, do not blindly pursue low prices! Inferior quality insulation or heating tape may trigger greater losses.